
New Developments Impacting Stock Awards in Europe and Brazil/Russia/China
In order to retain essential professional employees, American multinational corporation reward them with equity in the company. The idea is to keep those professionals who are most important to the company’s long term success as the more equity you have and the better the company does and the better you will do.
In
order to retain essential professional employees, American multinational
corporation reward them with equity in
the company. The idea is to keep those professionals who are most important to
the company’s long term success as the
more equity you have and the better the company does and the better you will
do. However, a question can arise as how
these employees perceive equity in different countries. “Re-Building
the old world BRIC by BRIC- New Developments Impacting Stock Awards in Europe
and Brazil?” was the theme of this rainy morning workshop held on October
3rd, 2012, at the Baker & Mackenzie law office located in New
York City. With partners and lawyers from their Firm’s Global Equity Services,
they addressed legal implications and
the most noteworthy issues of equity
compensation, tax issues and enforcement activities for multinationals with
employees in the US and abroad and why dealing with these issues can be a daunting
task.
Speaking
about Brazil , Hercules
Celescuekci, a Baker and Mackenzie partner working in Sao Paulo , explained that
granting equity awards to employees by US multinationals is common although this
is not often done by local companies
which generally offer stock only to top executives. Mr. Celescuekci stated that Brazilian SEC
rules require grants by local companies to be linked to results/performance and
treatment of performance-related amounts as local compensatory/salary.
This can mean significant social charges such as repercussion on salary, the paying of a 13th
month of salary, vacations, FGTS and other employee’s benefits. It has a significant
impact regarding termination/severance
pay, income tax and social security costs. Labor court precedents
and administrative rulings are inconsistent regarding these issues.
To know who are were the speakers go to: http://equitycompensationexperts.groupsite.com/calendar/event/2012/10/3/346744
To know who are were the speakers go to: http://equitycompensationexperts.groupsite.com/calendar/event/2012/10/3/346744
To read more about the subject, go to Baker and
Mackensie website. They have incredible articles/newsletter. Here are some:
http://www.bakermckenzie.com/files/Publication/bd3b49a7-8fb6-4901-86d2-7eaff3fc13d5/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/bc50b3aa-6af6-4c8f-9d14-82a9d8a2e533/ar_ges_costeffectiveprogram_nov09.pdf
http://www.bakermckenzie.com/nlgesrecentdevelopmentssep12/
http://www.bakermckenzie.com/files/Publication/a77a32d5-0719-49da-9049-6d70b7825c35/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/9c11cdde-4a31-4e9b-bda9-75f410bec78f/ar_us_globalstrategiesespp_sep12.pdf
http://www.bakermckenzie.com/files/Publication/bd3b49a7-8fb6-4901-86d2-7eaff3fc13d5/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/bc50b3aa-6af6-4c8f-9d14-82a9d8a2e533/ar_ges_costeffectiveprogram_nov09.pdf
http://www.bakermckenzie.com/nlgesrecentdevelopmentssep12/
http://www.bakermckenzie.com/files/Publication/a77a32d5-0719-49da-9049-6d70b7825c35/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/9c11cdde-4a31-4e9b-bda9-75f410bec78f/ar_us_globalstrategiesespp_sep12.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment